Tech Log inEmailPassword Remember meYour login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseMy New ScientistHomeNewsIn-Depth ArticlesBlogsOpinionTVGalleriesTopic GuidesLast WordSubscribeDatingLook for Science JobsSPACETECHENVIRONMENTHEALTHLIFEPHYSICS&MATHSCIENCE IN SOCIETYCookies & PrivacyHome|Tech|News
What can North Korean missiles hit? Can we stop them?12:31 09 April 2013 byPeter AldhousFor similar stories, visit theWeapons Technologyand The Nuclear AgeTopic Guides As Pyongyang's warlike rhetoric continues, South Korean government sources have suggested that North Korea's next moves may include a ballistic missile test, which could take place as soon as 10 April. New Scientist assesses the threat from North Korea's arsenal of rockets. If North Korea does conduct a missile test this week, what is likely to be involved?Most speculation surrounds a missile known as the Musudan. This is based on the Soviet R-27, designed in the 1960s to be launched from submarines. The North Korean variant, displayed at a military parade in Pyongyang in October 2010, would be deployed from a large truck. The Musudan would be an important advance over North Korea's workhorse ballistic missile, the No-dong, which has a range of up to 1300 kilometres. No-dongs are fuelled by kerosene, but the Soviet missile on which the Musudan is based used a more potent fuel: unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine. If the North Koreans have perfected the technology to use this fuel, the Musudan could have a range of 2500 to 4000 kilometres, which might just put the US Pacific territory of Guam in its sights. Test-fired from North Korea's east coast, a missile with this range would fly high over Japan and out into the Pacific Ocean. Has the Musudan flown before?
Some reports have suggested that the Musudan, also known as the No-dong B, was tested from Iran in 2006, but most security experts regard this as speculation. It seems unlikely that Pyongyang would use an untested missile for a pre-emptive military strike. "It could blow up on the launch pad," says David Wright of the Union of Concerned Scientists in Cambridge, Massachusetts. So a test flight seems like the obvious next step. Does North Korea have any other missiles up its sleeve?
In April 2012, six new missiles, dubbed the KN-08, were displayed at a parade in Pyongyang. At first glance, these looked like multi-stage intercontinental ballistic missiles, with a range of up to 10,000 km – which would put many US cities in range. However, two rocket engineers, Markus Schiller and Robert Schmucker of the consulting firm Schmucker Technologie in Munich, Germany, scrutinised images of the parade and concluded from subtle variations between the missiles that they were probably mock-ups. The KN-08, the consultants said, was a "dog and pony show" intended to confuse foreign analysts. North Korea recently put a satellite into orbit. Doesn't that suggest it can build an intercontinental ballistic missile?
If anything, the successful launch of a satellite into low-Earth orbit in December 2012 on its Unha-3 rocket indicates that Pyongyang may be further from building an ICBM than was previously thought. South Korea recovered pieces from the rocket's first stage, which showed it to be powered by a cluster of four No-dong engines. The Unha-3 might still be an ICBM in civilian space clothing, if its second stage was based on the Musudan, as had been thought. But its performance suggests that it relied on a Scud-class engine, smaller than those used on the No-dong. That's fine for lofting a small satellite, but of no use for sending a warhead across the Pacific. "The configuration they flew was not what you'd expect to see for a ballistic missile," says Wright. But even No-dongs could reach cities in South Korea and Japan. Could one of those be fitted with a nuclear warhead?
Some security experts believe that North Korea probably could put a nuclear weapon on a No-dong.That would help explain the low explosive yields of its 2006 and 2009 nuclear tests: rather than indicating faltering progress in building a large Manhattan Project-style bomb, Pyongyang may have been trying from the start to build a device small enough to put on a missile. So could the US and its allies shoot down a No-dong?
US officials seem confident that they can. The main line of defence would the Aegis antimissile system, deployed on both US and Japanese ships, which sends an interceptor to destroy an incoming missile while it is still above the atmosphere. According to the US Missile Defense Agency, in tests Aegis has eliminated a target missile in 24 of 30 attempts. It was also used in February 2008 to destroy a failed US spy satellite that was slowly falling back to Earth and so posed a small threat to Pacific islanders. That sounds reassuring. But do the tests prove that the system would work in the event of a real attack?
We don't know for sure. "These tests are designed to succeed," says George Lewis of the Judith Reppy Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. Shooting down a target you've launched yourself under controlled conditions is quite different from responding to a surprise attack, he points out. According to Ted Postol of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, North Korea probably won't deploy sophisticated antimissile countermeasures, such as decoy warheads. But he says that it wouldn't be hard for North Korean engineers to cause the spent missile body to break into a series of pieces. It remains unclear from the tests conducted so far whether the Aegis system could then identify and target a warhead from the multiple objects falling back to Earth. "There are so many unknowns," Postol says.
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.Have your sayOnly subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.
email:password:Remember meOnly personal subscribers may leave comments on this article
Subscribe now to comment.
One Important Item MissingWed Apr 10 23:27:35 BST 2013 by Michael DowlingEven if NK can mount a nuke on a missile,they still have to develop a reentry vehicle to protect the warhead.I suspect that would be at least as difficult as producing a reliable ICBM.
login and replyreport this commentA Question AnsweredThu Apr 11 09:18:11 BST 2013 by Grant McKennaGiven the problems that North Korea has experienced in giving their missiles extended range, we can now answer the question as to why the chicken crossed the road: so as to get out of the reach of North Korean missiles.
login and replyreport this commentAll comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
The engines North Korea used in this satellite launch in December 2012 were not as advanced as some thought the country could muster (Image: KCNA/Reuters)ADVERTISEMENTMoreLatest newsLinked smartphones catch the action from all angles
18:00 12 April 2013A system that connects multiple phones into wireless networks opens up a new vista of possibilities, from funky photo effects to enhanced live events
Online juries help curb bad gamer behaviour
15:00 12 April 2013In the heat of the moment, online players often hurl abuse at one another – crowd-based justice can help bring them back into line
Drone-wrecking laser gun to sail on US warship
13:42 12 April 2013Combat lasers that blow up hostile craft and are cheap to fire will soon be deployed at sea, but issues such as the risk of friendly fire remain unsolved
Map of the internet could make it stronger
08:00 12 April 2013The most comprehensive maps yet of the the internet's infrastructure could help shore it up against disasters and sabotage
see all related stories
MoreLatest newsCould an airliner be hacked by a smartphone? 20:14 12 April 2013A commercial pilot with computer security expertise claims he has worked out a way of hacking into an airliner's flight deck
Google lets you bequeath digital assets when you die19:20 12 April 2013The new Inactive Account Manager feature is designed to take care of all of your Google assets - whether emails on Gmail or YouTube videos - when you die
New Japanese method for killing dolphins is inhumane
18:03 12 April 2013Fishermen in Japan have adopted a new way of dispatching dolphins in drive hunts but the method is no more humane than previous techniques
Today on New Scientist: 12 April 201317:26 12 April 2013All the latest stories on newscientist.com: the map of the Internet, our closest non-human ancestor, and more
see all latest news
Most readMost commented Twist in dark matter tale hints at shadow Milky Way New Japanese method for killing dolphins is inhumane Astrophile: A handy guide to planetary parking spots Map of the internet could make it stronger Drone-wrecking laser gun to sail on US warship Most readMost commented Alien megaprojects: The hunt has begun Drone-wrecking laser gun to sail on US warship The hidden costs of austerity Wind power delivers too much to ignore Feedback: Conspiranoid swapshop TWITTERNew Scientist is on Twitter
Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed
LATEST JOBS St. Jude Children's Research Hospital: Preclinical Research Technician Paramount Recruitment: Software Developer - Scientific - Perl Paramount Recruitment: Senior Account Director - Healthcare Advertising Paramount Recruitment: Senior Account Manager - Healthcare Advertising Flame Pharma: Medical Affairs - Clinical Research Physicians Jobs In Manchester This week's issueSubscribe
For exclusive news and expert analysis, subscribe to New Scientist.
Gain full online accessCurrent issue contentContent of past issues13 April 2013ADVERTISEMENTBack to topLoginEmailPassword Remember meYour login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseAbout usNew ScientistSyndicationRecruitment AdvertisingStaff at New ScientistAdvertiseRBI JobsUser HelpContact UsFAQ / HelpDisclaimerTs & CsCookiesPrivacy PolicySubscriptionsSubscribeRenewGift subscriptionMy accountBack issuesCustomer ServiceLinksSite MapBrowse all articlesMagazine archiveNewScientistJobsThe Last WordRSS FeedsOnline StoreAndroid AppMobile site homeScience JobsBiology JobsChemistry JobsClinical JobsSales JobsEarth & Environment JobsEngineering JobsMaths & IT JobsGraduate Jobs© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.
No comments:
Post a Comment